K1A mess for sure

Posted on July 28th, 2010 by Brian Lee Crowley

Contemplating the current frenzy over the census, I am moved to ask: What should we call an issue that excites the usual suspects in Ottawa but doesn’t interest, or matter to, normal Canadians? In the United States they say “Inside the Beltway” but “North of the Queensway” isn’t really adequate.

When I was in the UK studying, I heard a talk by a very senior civil servant who, instead of using the “Whitehall” language to describe British government preoccupations, called them “SW1 problems”, SW1 being the postal code that covers much of the government machinery in London. “SW1 problems” were by definition “insider insider”, the things that preoccupied grey mandarins and fed the conversations in the pubs around government offices, but had no resonance in Balham or Birkenhead or Bristol.

I think we should adapt that to Canada and talk about an “Inside K1A” issue. because all postal codes beginning with K1A are for federal government offices and, moreover, it is the only postal code in the country that crosses a provincial boundary in order to take in parts of the federal bureaucracy located in Gatineau. (Only federal offices; all residential or private business addresses in Gatineau start with J.)

I think that if Canada has 100 top problems, whether or not we fill in a long form census is approximately number 536. What an “Inside K1A” issue.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

No related posts.

One Response to 'K1A mess for sure'

Subscribe to comments with RSS

  1. harry koza said,

    on July 29th, 2010 at 2:10 pm

    I have friends who always get the long form and complain vociferously about how intrusive it is and how much they hate filling it out. I’ve never yet gotten the long form, though, but I look forward to answering such questions as SEX? (occasionally) and RACE? (human).

    The whole kerfuffle over the issue seems more grounded in the Opposition searching desperately for a stick with which to beat the Harperites than in any logical arguments against the government’s idea of killing the compulsory long form. There should be no doubt that the long-form IS intrusive, coercive and a violation of citizens’ right to privacy. Oh, I forgot: like property rights, privacy rights were left out of the Trudeaupian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

    PS- liked your K1A line. Too true.

Post a comment