OTTAWA, April 16, 2015 – Calls for greater wealth transfer between high and low-income Canadians are louder than ever in a heated public debate about income inequality. But the debate has almost completely focused on tax rates, when in fact transfers have a much greater effect on reducing income inequality.
In a new paper for the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, Senior Fellow Philip Cross reveals that Canada’s system is already more progressive than many Canadians think, and is becoming more progressive over time.
By analysing both direct income taxes and government transfers – such as old age pension and employment insurance – Cross shows that high earners are already heavily subsidizing the incomes of the middle and lower classes.
The paper, titled “Giving and Taking Away: How taxes and transfers address inequality in Canada”, breaks down Canadians’ incomes into five groups of 20 percent, or “quintiles”.
To read the full report, click here.
It shows that people in the bottom three groups receive more money from the tax and transfer system than they gives up.
“This analysis shows that transfers from government constitute over half of all incomes in the bottom 20 percent of households and nearly one-quarter of income for the second lowest group”, says Cross.
The analysis also throws cold water on the idea that the government should transfer more wealth to the middle class. Cross shows that two of the three middle income groups (a rough proxy for the middle class) already get more than they give up.
Those making an average of $108,400 a year, meanwhile, lose about 19.1 per cent of their revenue in taxes and transfers. Those earning an average of $57,100 give up 8.2 per cent.
Cross notes that making the system more progressive would require even higher taxes on the wealthy, but there is little revenue to be gained from doing so. He recommends that the government focus less on wealth transfer and more on taking measures that improve the economy as a whole.
“Instead of focusing on modifying taxes and transfers to redistribute income, it would be better to adopt policies that boost market incomes for all classes”, he writes.
Philip Cross is a Senior Fellow with the Macdonald-Laurier Institute. He previously served as the Chief Economic Analyst for Statistics Canada, part of a 36-year career with the agency.
The Macdonald-Laurier Institute is the only non-partisan, independent national public policy think tank in Ottawa focusing on the full range of issues that fall under the jurisdiction of the federal government. Join us in 2015 as we celebrate our 5th anniversary.
For more information, please contact Mark Brownlee, communications manager, at 613-482-8327 x105 or email at email@example.com.